Darwin lied...

If being able to survive was a sign of the survival of the fittest and thus the foundation of the theory of evolution we sure have been taken for ride for the past two centuries.

The Dinosaurs supposedly became extinct because of a great global catastrophe and also because those huge lumbering creatures had pea sized brains. Same happened to the Sabre tooth tigers and mastodons before the great ice age.

Yet, we never hear of Sharks and Cockroaches evolving into higher creature beings despite being on the face of the earth for hundreds of millions of years. What happened to evolution? Then again evolution into what...?

Now mankind has supposedly been on the planet for only the last six million years, yet it has managed to evolve beyond a seemingly wild creature into having it's own distinct civilization. That is not what I claim, but what is asserted by leading scientists, anthropologists, sociologists, and other "...gists" around the world.

Now if we were to believe the theory of evolution and the past recorded history of the planet - mankind doesn't stand a chance, because going by the past the entire world will face devastation through either natural calamities or man-made extinction of all species.

So just being able to survive longer as a species does not necessarily make it a prime candidate for evolution. Maybe the same holds true for people just because someone has been around for a while doesn't necessarily make them more evolved from another fellow being in any way shape or manner.

Some of the people who we admire for their contributions (open to debate depending on POV)Alexander, Jesus, Kennedy, Ramanujam,or even the likes of Einstein and Marie Curie had their stroke of genius at a relatively early part of their lives.

So what does all the above mean... ? Make your own deductions and post your comments if you like!